[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why there is no char type?
|
From: |
Richard Stallman |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why there is no char type? |
|
Date: |
Wed, 15 Dec 2010 13:40:34 -0500 |
Then main reason I did not add a char type is that it would require a
bunch of new primitives, adding permanently to the complexity of Emacs
Lisp and its documentation. As well as complexity of Lisp code that
uses characters.
--
Richard Stallman
President, Free Software Foundation
51 Franklin St
Boston MA 02110
USA
www.fsf.org, www.gnu.org
- Re: Why there is no char type?, (continued)
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/14
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, David Kastrup, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/12/16
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Leo, 2010/12/15
- Re: Why there is no char type?,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Why there is no char type?, Andy Wingo, 2010/12/15
Re: Why there is no char type?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/12/14
Re: Why there is no char type?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/16