Re: Inconsistencies regarding nil coding-system

[Eli Zaretskii]

> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
> Date: Tue, 14 Dec 2010 10:41:18 +0900
> 
> > What would be a situation where it's inappropriate to interpret nil as
> > undecided?
> 
> For instance, coding-system-for-read being bound to nil and
> to `undecided' have different meanings.

You mean that `undecided' bypasses the various preferences?  If not,
then what's the difference between `undecided' and nil in this case?