[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core
From: |
Drew Adams |
Subject: |
RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core |
Date: |
Sat, 25 Sep 2010 07:42:44 -0700 |
> For instance, `remove-if' is obviously useful (I think it's
> often one of those "I use cl.el for that function" functions), not
> complex, and could probably be moved into the core in some
> simplified form.
>
> Suggested function signature: (remove-if PREDICATE SEQ [TEST]) -- and
> of course, change the cl.el version to deal with TEST as well.
+1 for remove-if(-not)
But I don't know what you meant by TEST.
AFAIK, the CL signature is this:
remove-if PREDICATE SEQ &key :from-end :start :end :count :key
Maybe you were thinking of `remove', which has `:test'?
- moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, MON KEY, 2010/09/24
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Leo, 2010/09/25
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Miles Bader, 2010/09/25
- RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core,
Drew Adams <=
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Leo, 2010/09/25
- RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Drew Adams, 2010/09/25
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Leo, 2010/09/25
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, David Kastrup, 2010/09/25
- RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Drew Adams, 2010/09/25
- RE: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Drew Adams, 2010/09/25
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Leo, 2010/09/25
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Daniel Colascione, 2010/09/30
- Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Miles Bader, 2010/09/25
Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core, Richard Stallman, 2010/09/26