[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: BZR and the bootstrap
From: |
Stephen J. Turnbull |
Subject: |
Re: BZR and the bootstrap |
Date: |
Mon, 09 Aug 2010 15:57:42 +0900 |
Óscar Fuentes writes:
> > Nothing bad should happen, because if I'm right, Emacs invokes
> > "bzr status" which is done entirely locally.
> He says that the modem lights blink, indicating network
> activity. So it seems that the OP is using a lightweight
> checkout. If that is true, I wonder what info bzr needs from
> upstream.
Everything. From the help message:
Usage: bzr checkout [BRANCH_LOCATION] [TO_LOCATION]
Options:
--lightweight Perform a lightweight checkout. Lightweight checkouts
depend on access to the branch for every operation.
It's penny-wise and pound-foolish for anybody who is unfamiliar with
Bazaar to use lightweight checkouts. Occasional contributors and beta
testers should invest in a full branch, bound or not depending on
their use cases.
- BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/08
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap,
Stephen J. Turnbull <=
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Angelo Graziosi, 2010/08/09
- Re: BZR and the bootstrap, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/08/09