[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption |
Date: |
Fri, 18 Jun 2010 00:33:44 +0200 |
On Thu, Jun 17, 2010 at 22:35, Juri Linkov <address@hidden> wrote:
> BTW, how users are supposed to customize `scroll-conservatively' to
> most-positive-fixnum? To write into the customization integer field
> by hand all digits of 2305843009213693951? ;-)
Any large integer, like 1000000, will suffice. But you have a point
that the defcustom for `scroll-conservatively' could have an option to
set it to max.
Juanma
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, (continued)
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, David Engster, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Stefan Monnier, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, David Engster, 2010/06/16
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Lennart Borgman, 2010/06/15
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/17
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juri Linkov, 2010/06/18
- Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/06/18
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, grischka, 2010/06/18
Re: The unwarranted scrolling assumption, grischka, 2010/06/25