Re: Concerning the new `ido-use-virtual-buffers' feature

[John Wiegley]

On May 27, 2010, at 2:10 AM, Tassilo Horn wrote:

> Ok, I see.  By the way, why is there another variable for that instead
> of different values to `ido-use-virtual-buffers' (nil, any non-nil and
> 'automatically)?  At least from a user perspective, I'd find that more
> logical, especially when using `customize'.

That's a great suggestion.  It should be nil, t, or `auto'.

John