[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook? |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 00:10:45 +0200 |
On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 23:53, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> I believe my last changes do make it work right in this case.
Yes, they do.
As an aside, it would be good to have a simple way to say "I don't
want global mode X applied to buffers Y, Z and W." Otherwise,
disabling and reenabling the global-minor-mode turns it on again on
buffers that previously disabled it via the MODE-hook.
But that's a different problem that the one you just fixed.
Thanks,
Juanma
- globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/25
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Glenn Morris, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Lennart Borgman, 2010/04/26
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/04/27
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/04/28
- Re: globalized minor modes - priority over mode hook?, David Reitter, 2010/04/28