[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: delete-selection-mode
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: delete-selection-mode |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Mar 2010 22:23:57 -0400 |
Personally I think that the traditional Emacs way of setting mark should
have neither delete-selection nor transient-mark by default. The reason
is that Emacs has two distinct uses for the mark - as a mark, and as one
end of the region. Transient-mark-mode and delete-selection-mode really
only apply when the mark is used as one end of the region, and get in
the way when the intention is to use the mark as a mark.
The reason I don't agree with this is that Transient Mark mode
is very useful with the traditional Emacs mark commands.
(I have mark-even-if-inactive set to t, which is what makes
Transient Mark mode acceptable.)
- Re: delete-selection-mode, (continued)
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/20
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/18
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/18
- Re: delete-selection-mode, David Kastrup, 2010/03/19
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Jason Rumney, 2010/03/19
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Richard Stallman, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20
- RE: delete-selection-mode, Drew Adams, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Miles Bader, 2010/03/20
- Re: delete-selection-mode, Lennart Borgman, 2010/03/20