Re: ChangeLogs on CVS? Commit netiquette.

[Karl Fogel]

"T.V. Raman" <address@hidden> writes:
>My cvs snapshot of emacs has Changelog files only upto the end of
>2009 --- has the repository moved, or  are there just no
>changelogs any more?

Hi, T.V.!  Emacs switched to Bazaar.  Please see

  http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/BzrForEmacsDevs

and ask any questions here, of course.

Best,
-Karl
  

>On 2/18/10, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>>>> This seems more of a short comming in `bzr log --short' than in the
>>>> way one writes commit messages.
>>
>> Not really: it's the whole idea behing "bzr log --short".
>>
>>> We currently *have* policies about ChangeLog entries and commit logs,
>>> so I agree with Óscar: it is a good practice and we should require
>>> people to follow it; and treat people who doesn't the same way we
>>> treat people who mangles ChangeLog entries (that is, a gentle but firm
>>> reminder that we have guideliness and we're all expected to follow
>>> them).
>>
>> Yes, please, we should require the first line of commit messages to be
>> an acceptable summary of the whole changeset.
>>
>> Could someone update log-edit-mode's font-lock patterns so that the
>> first line is highlighted specially (at least in the Bzr and Arch
>> cases)?
>>
>> I think log-edit-mode should even go further in this direction.
>> The buffer should be created as
>>
>>   ----------------
>>   Author:
>>   Summary:
>>
>>   blablabla
>>   ----------------
>>
>> where <blablabla> is the text taken from the ChangeLog.  Then for
>> backends which support the notion of summary-line, C-c C-c could just
>> signal an error if the Summary line is still blank.
>> After that, empty header entries will get removed and the text is passed
>> as-is to the backend who is then free to pass it as-is to the underlying
>> VCS or to extract the various fields and do whatever it feels like
>> with them.
>>
>>
>>         Stefan
>>
>>
>>