[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?
|
From: |
Karl Fogel |
|
Subject: |
Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow? |
|
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Alan Mackenzie <address@hidden> writes:
>Ah, right. The .../quickfixes/ needs to be physically under .../trunk,
>not just "related" to it. Thanks!
Wait, hunh? No, they should be siblings... something sounds wrong here.
-Karl
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, (continued)
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Juanma Barranquero, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Glenn Morris, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Karl Fogel, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Glenn Morris, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Eli Zaretskii, 2010/01/08
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Óscar Fuentes, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/07
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?, Stefan Monnier, 2010/01/06
- Re: Surely 'bzr branch' shouldn't be this slow?,
Karl Fogel <=