[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest
From: |
Chong Yidong |
Subject: |
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest |
Date: |
Wed, 09 Dec 2009 16:00:12 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden> writes:
> On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 21:46, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> One possibility is that the Makefile in the tarball doesn't compile the
>> semantic/*/*.elc files, but the change to Makefile.in, done by Stefan
>> after the tarball was made, fixes this. Dunno why the problem doesn't
>> show up on GNU/Linux, though.
>
> I don't think Makefile.in is involved in this; likely a problem with
> the Windows-specific makefile.w32-in.
>
> The problem, BTW, has surely been happening for a while on the trunk;
> we just didn't notice until now.
Then I am confused as to why "make cvs-update install" would fix the
problem.
- Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/08
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/08
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest,
Chong Yidong <=
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Glenn Morris, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/09
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Chong Yidong, 2009/12/11
- Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Juanma Barranquero, 2009/12/11
Re: Emacs 23.1.90 pretest, Giovanni Lanzani, 2009/12/09