[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge
From: |
Andreas Schwab |
Subject: |
Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge |
Date: |
Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:46:45 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1 (gnu/linux) |
Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> One minor disadvantage of this approach, BTW, is that we'll need to
> revise our byte-compilation process. Otherwise the semantic/foo.el
> files won't be byte-compiled during "make bootstrap" or "make
> recompile". But this change probably isn't difficult.
Shouldn't be much different from the term/*.el case.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, address@hidden
GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5
"And now for something completely different."
- Filename problem in CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/27
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/08/27
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Miles Bader, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eric M. Ludlam, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Chong Yidong, 2009/08/28
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge,
Andreas Schwab <=
- Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/28
Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Eli Zaretskii, 2009/08/28
Re: Filename problem in CEDET merge, Leo, 2009/08/28