[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all
From: |
Lennart Borgman |
Subject: |
Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all |
Date: |
Mon, 17 Aug 2009 13:55:52 +0200 |
On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 1:44 PM, Leo<address@hidden> wrote:
>> I think at least for CUA-mode and semantic-mode they instead good
>> examples on that eval-after-load can be useful even within Emacs. If I
>> understand it right these checks if an old version of the modes have
>> been loaded before the one that is now bundled with Emacs. Can you see
>> a better way to do this? I can't.
>
> I just found out those are added from within simple.el. But they look to me
> more like a last minute hack before release although I am not sure.
I am afraid you are totally misunderstanding this. You will see that
if you try to answer my question above.
> What those e-v-l's do is pretty little and they don't belong there. If
> there's a bug in, say, bbdb 2.29, should a new entry be added? After all
> if a package is installed by a user, it is the user's responsibility.
Yes, but that does not mean you should not try to help.
And these eval-after-load has probably avoided a lot of work for those
involved in Emacs development.
- eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), (continued)
- eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Daniel Colascione, 2009/08/10
- RE: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Drew Adams, 2009/08/10
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/10
- RE: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/10
- RE: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Drew Adams, 2009/08/10
- RE: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/11
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/11
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Leo, 2009/08/16
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/16
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Leo, 2009/08/17
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all,
Lennart Borgman <=
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Leo, 2009/08/17
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/17
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/10
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Daniel Colascione, 2009/08/10
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Leo, 2009/08/11
- Re: eval-after-load not harmful after all (Was: Re: Why js-2mode?), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2?, Carsten Dominik, 2009/08/10
- Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2?, Leo, 2009/08/10
- Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2?, Stefan Monnier, 2009/08/10
- Re: Why js2-mode in Emacs 23.2?, Glenn Morris, 2009/08/10