[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why are there two dolist?
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: Why are there two dolist? |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2009 08:34:49 +0900 |
Harald Hanche-Olsen <address@hidden> writes:
>> > I haven't looked at the code (recently), but because elisp doesn't
>> > natively support lexical blocks, I suspect the cl-macs version either
>> > (1) adds unnecessary runtime overhead, or (2) drags in lots of big and
>> > crufty compile-time analysis code (cl.el has lots of this) to optimize
>> > away the block when not used.
>
> Actually, the cl-macs version looks pretty simple to me.
Right, I checked -- it actually just incurs run-time overhead... :/
Anyway, the two-dolists are not the prettiest thing in the world, but
they work fine, and there's a reason for having them.
-miles
--
Do not taunt Happy Fun Ball.
- Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Miles Bader, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Lennart Borgman, 2009/08/11
- Re: Why are there two dolist?, Harald Hanche-Olsen, 2009/08/11