|
From: | Jason Rumney |
Subject: | Re: Sending attachments |
Date: | Wed, 08 Jul 2009 23:09:07 +0800 |
User-agent: | Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (Windows/20090605) |
I wrote: It is probably reasonable to use a type of application/octet-stream, disposition of attachment and have no description for simple attachments. .... We could have another command for attaching inline images and text files if that is a goal also, and such a function could .... Miles Bader quoted:
always have a disposition of inline, and again not use description.Sure, I agree there are times when inline can be useful -- my objection was to the (apparent) idea of having inline be the default without prompting (I think _if_ people want to avoid prompting, inline is the wrong default).
It seems you only read the last bit of what I wrote.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |