Commiting gdb-mi.el changes to Emacs upstream

[Dmitry Dzhus]

I'm now ready to push some of the changes I made to gdb-mi.el to Emacs
trunk. I personally use hg and now I'm thinking what's the best way to
put all the changes in Emacs CVS.

I did more than 60 commits to my repo since it was last «synced» (that
was done by Nick for me) with Emacs CVS.

On one hand, I don't want to upload all changes in one huge CVS commit
because it will be painful to track changes introduced:

 gdb-mi.el     | 1426 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------

On the other hand, I'm not sure if it's a good idea to spam Emacs CVS
with 60 commits.

Should I split the big patch into several (not dozens) more or less
self-contained patches?

Please tell me what's the preferred way to do it. If 60 commits are ok
i'll write a script which will push my mercurial commits to emacs cvs
commits (as long as it's possible). This way granularity I have in my
local repo will be preserved in Emacs upstream as well.
-- 
Happy Hacking.

http://sphinx.net.ru
む