Re: M-x compile and window splitting

[Frank Schmitt]

martin rudalics <address@hidden> writes:

> Are the lines below more helpful?

Yes, definitely.

> -----------------------------------
> ** Changes affecting display-buffer
>
> +++
> *** display-buffer tries to be smarter when splitting an existing window.
>
> +++
> **** The new option split-window-preferred-function lets you either
> choose among a number of standard methods to split the window or provide
> your own splitting function.
>
> +++
> **** The new function split-window-sensibly which provides the default
> value for split-window-preferred-function tries to split a window
> horizontally when vertical splitting fails.
>
> +++
> **** split-height-threshold and the new option split-width-threshold let
> you specify in more detail whether and how split-window-sensibly shall
> split the window.
>
> +++
> **** A window can be split vertically even when it's not full-width.
>
> +++
> *** If pop-up-frames has the value `graphic-only', display-buffer
> makes a separate frame on graphic displays only.
>
> +++
> *** select-frame and set-frame-selected-window have a new optional
> argument NORECORD.  If non-nil, this avoids messing with the order of
> recently selected windows and the buffer list and allow to more
> correctly identify the window least recently used when displaying a
> buffer.
> -------
>
>

-- 
Have you ever considered how much text can fit in eighty columns?  Given that a
signature typically contains up to four lines of text, this space allows you to
attach a tremendous amount of valuable information to your messages.  Seize the
opportunity and don't waste your signature on bullshit that nobody cares about.