[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject |
Date: |
Fri, 12 Dec 2008 18:03:21 -0500 |
> Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 13:47:56 -0800
> From: Don Armstrong <address@hidden>
>
> On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> > The bug tracker modifies the Subject lines, which breaks
> > `rmail-next-same-subject' and `rmail-previous-same-subject'.
>
> These commands have a fundamental problem; they really should be
> rmail-next-in-thread, rmail-previous-in-thread.
Threads are not guaranteed to exist in mailing lists, AFAIK.
> > I think it's not clean to depend on Subject mangling by specific
> > servers.
>
> That's why References: and In-Reply-To: exist.
You are evidently assuming that everybody uses MUA that preserve these
headers as they should. The reality is a bit different.
Anyway, these two commands served me well until now; it sounds a bit
ironic, to say the least, that an Emacs bug tracker would break their
utility.
- Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/12/12
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bug tracker breaks rmail-next-same-subject, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/13
- Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Glenn Morris, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Don Armstrong, 2008/12/13
- Re: Bugs against emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/13