[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: multi-threaded Emacs
From: |
Ted Zlatanov |
Subject: |
Re: multi-threaded Emacs |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Dec 2008 12:42:20 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
On Thu, 11 Dec 2008 13:30:26 -0500 Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
>> Then any ELisp function that builds on atomics is atomic
>> itself, presumably (except for macros and other trickery).
SM> No, atomicity does not work that way, sadly.
"atomic" was a bad word choice on my part. I meant "safe to put in an
(atomically) body as you described it." I think if functions A and B
are safe, then any function C that only uses A and B is safe too. Does
that make more sense?
Ted
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, (continued)
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Andreas Schwab, 2008/12/09
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Richard M Stallman, 2008/12/09
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2008/12/09
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Richard M Stallman, 2008/12/10
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Richard M Stallman, 2008/12/10
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/09
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Richard M Stallman, 2008/12/10
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/10
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Ted Zlatanov, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs,
Ted Zlatanov <=
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Paul R, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Giuseppe Scrivano, 2008/12/12
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/12
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Paul R, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/11
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Richard M Stallman, 2008/12/04
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Stefan Monnier, 2008/12/05
- Re: multi-threaded Emacs, Florian Beck, 2008/12/02
- Re[2]: multi-threaded Emacs, ak70, 2008/12/03