[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms.
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms. |
Date: |
Mon, 24 Nov 2008 09:31:20 +0100 |
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 08:52, Glenn Morris <address@hidden> wrote:
> I was going to say, why should that make a difference - they must all
> have come up with ways to do "automatic" syncs by now, or gone crazy.
> But in light of recent events, maybe not! :)
No, definitely not. :-)
> Only if it causes conflicts. I doubt there are many people with lots
> of uncommitted changes to doc-strings (or close by).
The problem there is that "Close by" can be anything...
Juanma
- Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Lute Kamstra, 2008/11/22
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Juanma Barranquero, 2008/11/22
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Glenn Morris, 2008/11/24
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms.,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/24
- RE: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Drew Adams, 2008/11/24
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Chong Yidong, 2008/11/24
- RE: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Drew Adams, 2008/11/24
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Chong Yidong, 2008/11/24
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/11/24
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Lute Kamstra, 2008/11/25
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Lute Kamstra, 2008/11/28
- Re: Leading * in docstrings of defcustoms., Juanma Barranquero, 2008/11/28