Re: files.el: Patch to make project-settings optional/customizable

[Dan Nicolaescu]

"Juanma Barranquero" <address@hidden> writes:

  > On Sun, Nov 23, 2008 at 13:10, Dan Nicolaescu <address@hidden> wrote:
  > 
  > > Why is the danger of redefining a function greater than simply using setq?
  > 
  > The danger here is that when the original function is improved, the
  > redefined one is not unless the user notices the changes.

And the reason emacs should care about that is... ?