[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge |
Date: |
Mon, 10 Nov 2008 10:26:04 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Chong Yidong <address@hidden> writes:
> I was looking through charset.c and character.c, and it seems to me that
> Vchar_unify_table is not used by anything.
It's used in the macro MAYBE_UNIFY_CHAR (in character.h) to
check if the upper area characters (#x110000-) must be
unified or not. But, as I wrote, the memory consumed by
that char-table is rather small. The bigger ones are
mapping tables of character sets.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, (continued)
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Kenichi Handa, 2008/11/06
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/11/07
- Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Stefan Monnier, 2008/11/07
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Chong Yidong, 2008/11/09
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge,
Kenichi Handa <=
Re: size of emacs executable after unicode merge, Kenichi Handa, 2008/11/21