[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path |
Date: |
Wed, 29 Oct 2008 16:12:28 +0100 |
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 16:03, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Actually 32 is no better than 42 or 100. The important part is that
> people shouldn't feel compelled to change 100 to 96 (or 32 to 28) when
> they reduce a size by 4.
That Ulrich felt the compulsion to change 100 to 96 shows how
intuitive is that 100 (or 32, of course).
> EXTRA_SPACE sounds fine,
OK.
Juanma
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Ulrich Mueller, 2008/10/28
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/28
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Ulrich Mueller, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Ulrich Mueller, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Juanma Barranquero, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path, Stefan Monnier, 2008/10/29
- Re: emacs client/server mode hardcodes /tmp path,
Juanma Barranquero <=