[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Release plans
From: |
Richard M. Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Release plans |
Date: |
Fri, 29 Aug 2008 19:48:09 -0400 |
Surely XRefactory's big advantage over CEDET is use of an EDG-based
parser (which costs money)? So in that sense the restrictions on how
the core gcc project develops (whether it can provide suitable dumps
of parse trees and the like) are more significant than restrictions on
The FSF would be glad to have features in GCC for outputting
cross-reference information, if that is the best way to do this job.
One drawback of that approach for cross-references is that it tends
to fail to show that this code uses both foo and bar:
#ifdef HAVE_XYZ
foo ();
#else /* not HAVE_XYZ */
bar ();
#endif /* not HAVE_XYZ */
- Re: Release plans, (continued)
- Re: Release plans, Stefan Monnier, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/08/30
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/30
- Re: Release plans, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/08/31
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2008/08/31
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans,
Richard M. Stallman <=
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Richard M. Stallman, 2008/08/28
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/29
- Re: Release plans, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Thomas Lord, 2008/08/27
- Re: Release plans, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/08/27