[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: X fonts selection weirdness
From: |
Kenichi Handa |
Subject: |
Re: X fonts selection weirdness |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:10:00 +0900 |
User-agent: |
SEMI/1.14.3 (Ushinoya) FLIM/1.14.2 (Yagi-Nishiguchi) APEL/10.2 Emacs/23.0.60 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) MULE/6.0 (HANACHIRUSATO) |
In article <address@hidden>, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> > Thank you. I've just installed a fix to pay attention to
> > DPI on font sorting. Please try with the latest code again.
> I couldn't find the corresponding patch, so just to make sure: by "pay
> attention" you don't mean that you compare various fonts DPI, right?
> DPIs are irrelevant, what we want instead is to sort based on the pixel
> size or on pointsize/dpi.
What I modified is the function font_score. I made it to
prefer the same DPI if the pixelsize is the same.
Previously, as this log shows:
sort-by: -misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--14-*-75-75-c-70-iso8859-1
x:-misc-fixed-medium-r-normal--14-*-100-100-c-70-iso8859-1
the difference of DPI was ignored.
---
Kenichi Handa
address@hidden
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, (continued)
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/26
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/26
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Richard M Stallman, 2008/06/27
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, David Kastrup, 2008/06/25
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Yoshiaki Kasahara, 2008/06/26
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness,
Kenichi Handa <=
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/24
- Re: X fonts selection weirdness, Kenichi Handa, 2008/06/24