"Lennart Borgman" <address@hidden> writes:
Eh? Maybe (hopefully!) I misunderstand what's being said, but any
change that makes the arrow keys do the "right thing", but _not_ C-n/C-p
is broken, full stop.
Both things are "right", it might be good to have both behaviors available.
I guess those using the arrow keys more expect the new behaviour.
In general, C-n/C-p should do exactly the same thing as the arrow keys.
The context of this discussion AFAIK, is with regard to Kim's
display-time word-wrapping patch. The typical situation where you would
want display-time word-wrapping is when you're editing text where
there's one newline per paragraph. When editing such text, "visual"
line-movement becomes more or less a necessity for normal editing, and
clearly we want C-n/C-p to be usable for normal editing.