[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally'
From: |
martin rudalics |
Subject: |
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally' |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Jun 2008 10:21:52 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (Windows/20041206) |
> BTW, shouldn't `sensibly' be the default?
As soon as we have decided on a reasonable standard behavior.
> Or even the only acceptable setting (besides setting it to
> a home-cooked function)?
> I mean the nil value can be simulated with
>
> (setq split-width-threshold most-positive-fixnum)
>
> and the `horizontal' value can be emulated with
>
> (setq split-height-threshold most-positive-fixnum)
>
> If most-positive-fixnum is too inconvenient, we could accept a nil
> setting for the thresholds to mean the same as most-positive-fixnum.
Sounds reasonable. But how do we present the conventional `vertical'
default value in the customization interface?
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', (continued)
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', martin rudalics, 2008/06/08
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', David Hansen, 2008/06/08
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', David Hansen, 2008/06/09
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', martin rudalics, 2008/06/10
- Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/10
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/06
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally',
martin rudalics <=
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/07
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', martin rudalics, 2008/06/07
Re: `split-window-preferred-horizontally', Stefan Monnier, 2008/06/07