[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el]
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el] |
Date: |
Fri, 23 May 2008 14:19:59 +0300 |
> Date: Fri, 23 May 2008 12:11:11 +0200
> From: "Roland Winkler" <address@hidden>
> Cc: address@hidden
>
> (I interpret your email such that you would consider it worth the
> effort to implement this on the C level.)
Yes, that's what I meant.
> My problem is just that this goes way beyond my skills.
Well, maybe at least consider refactoring the current Lisp code so
that the code which relies on `ps' is limited to a few functions with
well-defined interfaces. Then someone else could reimplement them in
a portable fashion.
Thanks.
- docstrings in dired.el, Roland Winkler, 2008/05/23
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el [was: docstrings in dired.el], Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Eli Zaretskii, 2008/05/24
- Re: proced.el, Stefan Monnier, 2008/05/24
Re: docstrings in dired.el, Richard M Stallman, 2008/05/23