[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: What IDE features do we need? defaults!]
From: |
joakim |
Subject: |
Re: What IDE features do we need? defaults!] |
Date: |
Tue, 22 Apr 2008 15:41:26 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) |
Eli Zaretskii <address@hidden> writes:
> In addition, etags does not really grok C++ and Java style
> object-oriented languages, so it cannot, for example, let you complete
> on class members, or show signatures of class methods, whether in
> tooltips or elsewhere.
>
>> Improving etags this way would be more of a stop-gap than a solution.
>> It just isn't powerful enough for that sort of proprietary environment.
>
> I don't see why not; could you explain?
>
> OTOH, we could also base an Emacs solution on something like ID-Utils,
> but that would require to develop parsers for popular languages such
> as C++, Java, Python, etc. As yet another alternative, we could use
> Ebrowse, although it, too, needs some work to catch up with current
> C++ standards (from a few blatant bugs I recently uncovered in
> Ebrowse, I conclude that it is almost unused).
I think Cedet is the way to go, since it supports a common Emacs
interface to several different tag generating backends, some of which
are written entirely in elisp.
>
--
Joakim Verona
- Re: Please stop proposing changes in defaults!, (continued)
- RE: What IDE features do we need? defaults!], Drew Adams, 2008/04/22
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, Alan Mackenzie, 2008/04/22
- RE: What IDE features do we need?, Drew Adams, 2008/04/22
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, joakim, 2008/04/22
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, Eric Hanchrow, 2008/04/22
- RE: What IDE features do we need?, Drew Adams, 2008/04/22
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, Juri Linkov, 2008/04/22
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, Richard Stallman, 2008/04/23
- Re: What IDE features do we need?, Tassilo Horn, 2008/04/23