[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: VC state
From: |
Dan Nicolaescu |
Subject: |
Re: VC state |
Date: |
Sun, 06 Apr 2008 10:40:48 -0700 |
Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> writes:
> I tried to use vc-status with Bzr and found that VC still needs some
> work to adjust it to current VCS realities:
Please add to vc.el:Todo the items that are not already there.
> - `vc-update' should do a `bzr pull'.
> - `vc-merge' only operates on a single file.
> - `vc-merge' takes revisions as arguments rather than a branch (plus
> optional revisions).
>
> The above changes will require changing some of the backend operations,
> since those operations will need to somehow return a list of files
> changed.
>
> The vc-status UI also needs more work:
The main question for vc-status is: should it be bound to C-x v d now?
It's already better than vc-dired. And it would be good if more people
use it/hack on it to shake the remaining bugs sooner rather than later.
> - there should be a way to operate on (sub)directories.
You mean something more than M-x vc-status DIR/SUBDIR RET ?
> - it should be possible to add an entry in the display (like PCL-CVS's
> `I') so as to then operate on it.
Interesting, didn't know about this feature. I'll implement this.
> - indicate files with conflicts (probably requires changes in backends
> as well to provide that info).
This has been in Todo for a while, displaying this stuff is trivial, VC
needs just to provide the information. Someone just needs to sit down
and figure out how it's supposed to work in VC...
> - the modeline says "*VC status* from *vc-status*".
Fixed.
- VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/06
- Re: VC state,
Dan Nicolaescu <=
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Stefan Monnier, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Nick Roberts, 2008/04/08
- Re: VC state, Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/04/09