Re: iswitchb

[paul r]

> What probably should be adjusted here is the ordering when you've
>  typed in the exact name of a buffer; that buffer should just come to
>  the front of the list (with possible exceptions for foo<1> et al?).
>  That way iswitchb will get out of the way of people who expect the old
>  behavoir, but allow people to gradually learn the new behavoir.

Yes, that what I thought later, reading again RMS case. In any case,
*exact match* should alway take you to this buffer, with the exception
of when you already are in this buffer.
More generaly, I agree iswitchb should behave like switch-to-buffer
for features they share.