[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: User-Agent header
|
From: |
Xavier Maillard |
|
Subject: |
Re: User-Agent header |
|
Date: |
Tue, 26 Feb 2008 03:00:19 +0100 |
|
User-agent: |
Rmail in GNU Emacs 23.0.60.2 on GNU/Linux |
> MH-E is still using X-Mailer (although we could update the format
> of the header field to conform with this draft).
That's the right thing to do for a mail-only MUA, IMO.
I read all the RFC 2616 and I think this what I'll do but I will
try to conform to the RFC 2616 even with a X-Mailer header (Note:
this is not the case yet).
Thank you all for your clarifications.
By the way, what do people think about either the patch or my
proposition to change the behaviour of b-u-b-f variable ?
Xavier
--
http://www.gnu.org
http://www.april.org
http://www.lolica.org
- [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/23
- Re: [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point, Reiner Steib, 2008/02/24
- Re: [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point, Leo, 2008/02/24
- User-Agent header (was: [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point), Reiner Steib, 2008/02/24
- Re: User-Agent header, Leo, 2008/02/24
- User-Agent header (was: [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point), Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/24
- Re: User-Agent header, Bill Wohler, 2008/02/24
- Re: User-Agent header, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2008/02/24
- Re: User-Agent header,
Xavier Maillard <=
Re: [PATCH] New function to send a mail to the recipient at point, Xavier Maillard, 2008/02/25