Re: Extensive changes during pretest

[Michael McNamara]

Eli Zaretskii <eliz <at> gnu.org> writes:

> 
> Why are so many changes being checked-in so late in the pretest?  They
> don't seem to be bugfixes to me (see below).

My changes are all bug fixes. Note I and my colleagues have been maintaining
this mode for 15 years at http://www.verilog.com, including a test suite.  With
this release of emacs, we are including the current version of verilog-mode.el
as a progmode inside of emacs-22.  It would be excellent if we start out with
the current version of the verilog-mode.el in the emacs-22 release.

Please let me know what you would like me to do.

> 
> Would the head maintainers please state clear guidelines on what
> should and what should not be installed at this time?  In the absence
> of a formal procedure for reviewing patches before they are committed
> and/or for posting them after the commit, I think it's imperative we
> have clear and agreed-upon guidelines.
> 
> Here are the changes that prompted this message:
> 
>   2008-02-21  Michael McNamara  <mac <at> mail.brushroad.com>
> 

...