|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: CUA-mode features and documenation |
Date: | Thu, 14 Feb 2008 01:58:25 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Miles Bader wrote:
Juri Linkov <address@hidden> writes:_Instead_ of? I think you've been smoking too much Xah Lee...I am not an extremist but it seems that having two similar menu items will be too confusing. I think `cua-selection-mode' is closer to what most users expect from this type of thing nowadays.Most users expect MS word. That's not what Emacs is. transient-mark-mode is a popular and straight-forward feature that highlights (heh!) Emacs' native command set, and I don't think we should bury such things.
Is it not reasonable to assume that most new users expects and wants the behaviour that cua-selection-mode gives?
Can you explain what is lost if cua-selection-mode is used instead of transient-mark-mode?
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |