|
From: | Lennart Borgman (gmail) |
Subject: | Re: charprop.el and uni-*.el |
Date: | Tue, 12 Feb 2008 10:25:09 +0100 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.9) Gecko/20071031 Thunderbird/2.0.0.9 Mnenhy/0.7.5.666 |
Jason Rumney wrote:
Kenichi Handa wrote:In article <address@hidden>, Jason Rumney <address@hidden> writes:Should the uni-*.el files be checked in as binary? They don't appear to be utf-8 as the coding tag at the bottom claims.No, they encode (a kind of) binary data using Unicode character codes. I used that format to minimize the file sizes.Binary data is still binary data after it has been utf-8 encoded. And wouldn't encoding it make the file size bigger, as now all bytes with values in the 128-255 range take up two bytes instead of one?
Here are some errors I got right now during bootstrap after a fresh checkout:
Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/quail.elc Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/robin.elc Wrote c:/eclean/bld/emacs/lisp/international/titdic-cnv.elcFile local-variables error: (error "Local variables entry is missing the suffix")
In toplevel form: international/uni-bidi.el:492:34:Error: End of file during parsingFile local-variables error: (error "Local variables entry is missing the suffix")
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |