[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*
|
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
|
Subject: |
Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation* |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Feb 2008 11:15:05 -0500 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
> I would guess that a default of t for compilation-scroll-output would be
> better that the current default of nil, but YMMV. When I'm compiling, I
> generally want to see progress, so I generally want Emacs to scroll the
> window for me.
Agreed,
Stefan
- [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Chong Yidong, 2008/02/04
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/04
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/05
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/06
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Stefan Monnier, 2008/02/06
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Richard Stallman, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Miles Bader, 2008/02/07
- Re: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, David Kastrup, 2008/02/07
- RE: [21.1.90]: point put at point-min in *compilation*, Marshall, Simon, 2008/02/07