[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: merging the unicode-2 branch
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: merging the unicode-2 branch |
Date: |
Mon, 07 Jan 2008 12:02:13 +0900 |
Richard Stallman <address@hidden> writes:
> I will accept non-simplified change logs for the unicode-2 merge.
>
> I usually find simplified change logs easier to read precisely because
> they are simpler, but these changes may be so voluminous that it makes
> no difference.
Are there any other issues blocking the merge?
-Miles
--
We live, as we dream -- alone....
- Automatically generated ChangeLogs (was: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), (continued)
- merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/03
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Richard Stallman, 2008/01/05
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Dan Nicolaescu, 2008/01/05
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Andreas Schwab, 2008/01/05
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Stefan Monnier, 2008/01/05
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch (was: Re: Selection-set editing without VC-dired), Richard Stallman, 2008/01/06
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Nick Roberts, 2008/01/07
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, David Kastrup, 2008/01/07
- Re: merging the unicode-2 branch, Miles Bader, 2008/01/07