[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: To be a list or not
From: |
Miles Bader |
Subject: |
Re: To be a list or not |
Date: |
Sun, 30 Dec 2007 07:40:21 +0900 |
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <address@hidden> writes:
> > (defun proper-list-p (x)
> > (and (listp x)
> > (null (cdr (last x)))))
>
> But please call it `true-list-p', which is the name of the similar
> XEmacs built-in.
I think "proper" is the commonly used terminology though...
-Miles
--
Ich bin ein Virus. Mach' mit und kopiere mich in Deine .signature.
- To be a list or not, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Nick Roberts, 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Bob Rogers, 2007/12/28
- Re: To be a list or not, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not,
Miles Bader <=
- Re: To be a list or not, Tom Tromey, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not, Andreas Schwab, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not, Tom Tromey, 2007/12/31
- Re: To be a list or not, Andreas Schwab, 2007/12/31
- Re: To be a list or not, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not, Bob Rogers, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/29
- Re: To be a list or not, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/29
Re: To be a list or not, Eric Hanchrow, 2007/12/28
Re: To be a list or not, Richard Stallman, 2007/12/29