[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: unused local variables
From: |
Juanma Barranquero |
Subject: |
Re: unused local variables |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 19:11:37 +0100 |
On Nov 30, 2007 4:59 PM, Stefan Monnier <address@hidden> wrote:
> Right. So you're OK with adding (defvar my-dynamic-var) in one of the
> files but not in both? Why is that?
I'm not really opposing. I don't like warnings, nor programming errors
caused by subtle interactions (or unexpected ones). Once again: I like
lexically scoped languages (Scheme excluded). I'm just not sure
littering packages with (defvar var) or (declare-function function) is
better. It certainly doesn't look clean.
Juanma
- Re: unused local variables, (continued)
- Re: unused local variables, David Kastrup, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, David Kastrup, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, tomas, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables,
Juanma Barranquero <=
- Re: unused local variables, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: unused local variables, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29