[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: dired-mark
From: |
Andreas Röhler |
Subject: |
Re: dired-mark |
Date: |
Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:42:16 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
Am Freitag, 30. November 2007 16:11 schrieb Stefan Monnier:
> >>> Should you know a precise case where marking the "."
> >>> and ".." in the dired-buffer are useful, I would like
> >>> to read about that.
> >>
> >> E.g. when you want to change the permissions?
> >
> > Incidentally, dired-do-chmod refuses to operate on "." and "..".
>
> Sounds like a bug to me,
>
>
> Stefan "who admits to using zsh rather than dired"
>
For ".." I think it's ok to have it disabled.
For "." enabling them might be useful.
From the marking question this would constat a special
case, as it addresses remaining files at once.
So to operate on them, should be not need to mark it before,
because it's no alternative selection then.
Andreas Röhler
- dired-mark, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/29
- Re: dired-mark, Tassilo Horn, 2007/11/29
- Re: dired-mark, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/29
- RE: dired-mark, Drew Adams, 2007/11/29
- Re: dired-mark, Andreas Röhler, 2007/11/29
- Re: dired-mark, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/29
- Re: dired-mark, Andreas Schwab, 2007/11/30
- Re: dired-mark, Stefan Monnier, 2007/11/30
- Re: dired-mark,
Andreas Röhler <=