[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: recent changes to org files
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: recent changes to org files |
Date: |
Tue, 23 Oct 2007 22:50:03 -0400 |
If calling `next-line' is really correct in org-mode, it ought to be
called inside (with-no-warnings ...) to (1) suppress the compiler
warning and (2) show programmers "yes we really mean this, it wasn't a
dumb mistake".
Thus, the code that called `next-line' needed to be fixed one way or another.
If not by changing to `forward-line' then by adding `with-no-warnings'.
At the same time, this shows the need to look more closely at a program
before changing `next-line' to `forward-line'. That change is only safe
if point is at the beginning of a line. So you need to check that that is
always so, before making the change.
- Re: recent changes to org files, (continued)
- Re: recent changes to org files, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, David Kastrup, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Carsten Dominik, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, David Kastrup, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Carsten Dominik, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Stefan Monnier, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Carsten Dominik, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: recent changes to org files, Carsten Dominik, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Glenn Morris, 2007/10/29
- Re: recent changes to org files, John Wiegley, 2007/10/29
- Re: recent changes to org files, Carsten Dominik, 2007/10/30
- Re: recent changes to org files, Miles Bader, 2007/10/23
- Re: recent changes to org files, Miles Bader, 2007/10/22