On Sun, 07 Oct 2007 19:56:49 -0700, address@hidden
(Randal L. Schwartz) said:
YAMAMOTO> Of course it's up to you whether to make such a plea. But
YAMAMOTO> keep in mind that developers' time and effort for multi-tty
YAMAMOTO> and Unicode support on the Carbon port might be wasted if
YAMAMOTO> the Cocoa/GNUStep port becomes good enough for Emacs 23. I
YAMAMOTO> don't think it's a good idea to invest them in catching up
YAMAMOTO> with the trunk NOW.
YAMAMOTO> The situation is different from that of pre-22: we have a
YAMAMOTO> brand-new first stable release version running on the Mac
YAMAMOTO> native window system and ordinary Mac users don't need to
YAMAMOTO> use the CVS version, there's an alternative, and the next
YAMAMOTO> major release does not happen too soon.
So, you're saying that there will be a non-X11 version of Emacs for
OSX in the works, even though it's not usable just yet? Do you have
an idea of when it might be usable?
I'm not saying it is not "usable". You can try and see it yourself by
downloading it from http://emacs-app.sourceforge.net/. I think it's
too early to judge if it becomes good enough for Emacs 23.
YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu
address@hidden
_______________________________________________
Emacs-devel mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel