[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer
From: |
Eric S. Raymond |
Subject: |
Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Oct 2007 17:49:29 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.15+20070412 (2007-04-11) |
Juanma Barranquero <address@hidden>:
> On 10/10/07, Eric S. Raymond <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > A recursive check for version differences is not what you expected?
> > It seems the most natural thing to do there.
>
> When I'm visiting a file that is not under any version control system,
> then no, I don't expect a recursive check. I expect an error message.
Hm. Even if there are other version-controlled files beneath the
current directory?
I can change this behavior. But I was preserving an earlier capability
to say, in effect, "tell me what has changed under this directory,
*without* making me list all the files to diff".
I think people are likely to become quite upset with me if I
remove that.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
- vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer,
Eric S. Raymond <=
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/14
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Andreas Schwab, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Eric S. Raymond, 2007/10/10
- Re: vc-diff in non-VC buffer, Richard Stallman, 2007/10/11