[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: emacs.git mirror status
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: emacs.git mirror status |
Date: |
Fri, 14 Sep 2007 22:09:22 -0400 |
> For git, the sole difference between a merge and an import is that the
> former has the branch as a parent commit. All the other history is
> reconstructed by git on the fly rather than tracked. So just
> redeclaring the respective CVS checkins
There are no such checkins. The history is located only in the various
arch trees of Miles and Karoly.
People spoke of the "multi-tty branch". I presumed that meant a
branch in our CVS repository. Is that not so?
(I don't know enough about CVS to find out for myself.)
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, (continued)
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/15
- Re: emacs.git mirror status,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/15
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/16
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/16
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Richard Stallman, 2007/09/17
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/17
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Glenn Morris, 2007/09/17
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Stefan Monnier, 2007/09/17
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/17
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, David Kastrup, 2007/09/14
- Re: emacs.git mirror status, Andreas Schwab, 2007/09/14