[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp |
Date: |
Fri, 03 Aug 2007 18:01:54 -0400 |
Actually, the date should be the date it was committed, so it should
be sorted. Not sure about what should happen in case of merges, tho.
A merge into the trunk should be treated like any other installation
into the trunk. The change log entries should look the same as they
would if the changes had been installed some other way.
This is because, that if you are merging into the trunk, you should
combine and simplify the change log entries.
- ChangeLog entry timestamp, Vinicius Jose Latorre, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, David Kastrup, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, Stefan Monnier, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, David Kastrup, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, Andreas Schwab, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, Jason Rumney, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, Richard Stallman, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp, Miles Bader, 2007/08/03
- Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp,
Richard Stallman <=