Re: Adding ispell-multi.el and friends to Emacs

[Peter Heslin]

Agustin Martin <address@hidden> writes:

> but even if ispell-multi is
> integrated into ispell.el, at least for flyspell-large-region is still good
> to have ispell.el and flyspell.el keelping a record of buffer
> session-accepted words and handle them properly (f-l-a uses a completely
> different ispell process).

That reminds me -- flyspell-babel and flyspell-xml-lang switch off
flyspell-large-region, because by design it starts a single dedicated
ispell process.  So flyspell-large-region would need to be rewritten to
iterate over language-regions if ispell-multi were integrated into Emacs.

Peter

-- 
Peter Heslin (http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.j.heslin)