[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Post-22.1 development?
From: |
Sean O'Rourke |
Subject: |
Re: Post-22.1 development? |
Date: |
Thu, 07 Jun 2007 15:42:14 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (darwin) |
David Reitter <address@hidden> writes:
> I generally recommend Carbon Emacs to people who have been using
> Emacs for a long time.
Right, and although there's something to be said for doing things
à la Emacs, I'm gradually accepting that it's not possible to
convert everyone to the old-school point of view. ;)
> - better support of variable-width fonts
Absolutely, e.g. for reading info pages. It should be little
more work to do this agreeably than to do it at all.
> - optional replacement of windows inside frames with multiple
> frames
This, on the other hand, seems harder to get right without
disturbing people's habits. Perhaps adding more customization to
pop-to-buffer and display-buffer is the way to go?
> - toolbars using the system's toolkit rather than something homegrown
> - toolkit based dialogs with a redesigned customization hierarchy
> rather than customization buffers
As long as they're optional. Figuring out the interaction
between `custom-set-variables' and `setq' wasn't my idea of a
good time, and I'd rather not do something similar for
`gui-save-dialog-options'. :)
/s
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, (continued)
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Alan Mackenzie, 2007/06/07
- 48 line console [was Re: Post-22.1 development]?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07
- Re: 48 line console, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/07
- Re: 48 line console, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/07
- Re: 48 line console, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/08
- Re: 48 line console, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/08
- Re: 48 line console, Thien-Thi Nguyen, 2007/06/08
- Re: 48 line console [was Re: Post-22.1 development]?, Alan Mackenzie, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Miles Bader, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Reitter, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?,
Sean O'Rourke <=
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, David Reitter, 2007/06/07
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Mathias Dahl, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Richard Stallman, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, csant, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, Jan Djärv, 2007/06/08
- Re: Post-22.1 development?, YAMAMOTO Mitsuharu, 2007/06/07
Re: Post-22.1 development?, Nick Roberts, 2007/06/05