Re: pretest 22.0.100

[Stefan Monnier]

>> Yes, the same mistake was made then (but was not made for Emacs-20.1).
>> It's no excuse to repeat it.

> If it was deliberate, then it was not a mistake. And history shows that
> Emacs has always had version numbers, not version strings.

If people feel so strongly about it, go for it and use 22.0.100 or any other
number that makes you happy, really.  I just think 22.0.990 etc... is much
cleverer since it makes it both numerically and alphabetically increasing.
I never imagined people would waste time arguing against it.


        Stefan