[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Sat, 31 Mar 2007 13:02:48 +0300 |
> From: Kenichi Handa <address@hidden>
> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2007 09:47:06 +0900
> Cc: address@hidden, address@hidden, address@hidden,
> address@hidden
>
> As the other people say, I strongly recommend to add
> something like the following text in etc/PROBLEMS.
>
> On Windows, to bind a non-ASCII character with some modifier
> to a command, you must specify a raw byte code. For
> instance, if you want to bind meta-a-grave to a command:
> (global-set-key [?\M-\340] ...)
> That is for the case of Latin-1 environment where the byte
> code of a-grave is \340.
Done.
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/28
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Chong Yidong, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/03
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/02