[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence
From: |
Stefan Monnier |
Subject: |
Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence |
Date: |
Thu, 29 Mar 2007 12:11:45 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.93 (gnu/linux) |
> I think it's a bug. It surely handles the ? the same
> regardless of the modifiers. In both cases, it doesn't
> decode the key event \351 to ?. Windows code ask
> encoded-kbd-mode to decode it. And, although
> Encoded-kbd-mode can decode \351 to ?, it can't decode
> M-\351 to M-?.
> That sounds like a clear bug in encoded-kbd-mode.
No, the bug in the use of encoded-kbd-mode. The decoding should be
done elsewhere, as is done in X11.
Stefan
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, (continued)
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kim F. Storm, 2007/03/19
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/25
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/26
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/27
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence,
Stefan Monnier <=
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/30
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Richard Stallman, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Eli Zaretskii, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Juanma Barranquero, 2007/03/31
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Kenichi Handa, 2007/03/29
- Re: kbd vs read-key-sequence, Stefan Monnier, 2007/03/29